Trusted independent reportCross-border relevantPublication date verified
American Banker — Payments Intelligence
What RTP and FedNow rule changes mean for cross-border payments
WHAT HAPPENED
American Banker reports that The Clearing House plans a rule change later in 2026 that would let one leg of an RTP transaction involve a foreign bank. Separately, the Federal Reserve has proposed changes that would let a U.S. bank use FedNow when an intermediary or correspondent supports a cross-border payment. The report says RTP represented about 97% of U.S. instant-payment volume in the second quarter and cites Swift's view that roughly 80% of a cross-border payment journey occurs in the domestic last mile.
PUBLISHED August 10, 2026SOURCE American Banker — Payments IntelligenceLANE Cross-border market
KEY FIGURES
about 97%
RTP share of U.S. instant-payment volume cited for Q2
about 80%
Cross-border payment journey occurring in the domestic last mile, according to Swift
WHAT TO WATCH NEXT
Watch whether follow-up sources disclose whether the metric persists, the cross-border segment mix, margins, and management guidance.
Independent American Banker report based on planned RTP rules, a Federal Reserve proposal and industry interviews. The reported changes are not yet evidence of implementation, adoption or achieved payment performance.
The page already presents the summary and analysis. This section keeps only the copy, download, and technical source record without repeating the same reading view.
View technical text
# What RTP and FedNow rule changes mean for cross-border payments
> Evidence tier: B1
> Evidence type: Independent payments trade media report based on network rules, a Federal Reserve proposal and industry interviews
> Source: [American Banker — Payments Intelligence](https://www.americanbanker.com/payments/news/what-rtp-and-fednow-rule-changes-mean-for-cross-border-payments)
> Published: 2026-08-10
> Captured: 2026-08-11T01:47:08.951Z
## Source summary
American Banker reports that The Clearing House plans a rule change later in 2026 that would let one leg of an RTP transaction involve a foreign bank. Separately, the Federal Reserve has proposed changes that would let a U.S. bank use FedNow when an intermediary or correspondent supports a cross-border payment. The report says RTP represented about 97% of U.S. instant-payment volume in the second quarter and cites Swift's view that roughly 80% of a cross-border payment journey occurs in the domestic last mile.
## Why it matters
Both changes would let domestic instant-payment rails serve a defined part of a cross-border transaction instead of requiring every leg to remain domestic. That could improve the U.S. last mile, but it does not create end-to-end international interoperability, remove FX and compliance work, or establish achieved speed and cost savings. The RTP change is planned and the FedNow change remains a proposal.
## Key numbers
- **RTP share of U.S. instant-payment volume cited for Q2:** about 97%
- **Cross-border payment journey occurring in the domestic last mile, according to Swift:** about 80%
## Topics and entities
- Industry lane: Cross-border market
- Entities: The Clearing House / Federal Reserve
- Cross-border payments
- Payment infrastructure
## Evidence and credibility note
Independent American Banker report based on planned RTP rules, a Federal Reserve proposal and industry interviews. The reported changes are not yet evidence of implementation, adoption or achieved payment performance.
Date evidence: Automatically verified from article:published_time: 2026-08-10T19:12:21.644
## First-party corroboration
No directly corresponding A1 company announcement is currently linked.
## Original-source traceback
[Open the original American Banker — Payments Intelligence report](https://www.americanbanker.com/payments/news/what-rtp-and-fednow-rule-changes-mean-for-cross-border-payments)
---
This is a structured Payments Hot Markdown source summary derived from external reporting. Use the original link above to read the publisher's article; copyright remains with the original publisher.